Portfolio-context example
Landscape map
Map a technology area, assignee set, or diligence topic before deeper review.
Review output
The report gives an owner/reference map with coverage assumptions and follow-up questions.
Start with name the area, assignees, date window, and the business question.. The report shows the working assumptions, cited evidence, and approvals before credits are used or exports are created.
- Technology scope
- Visible in the report before the work is relied on or exported.
- Assignee clusters
- Visible in the report before the work is relied on or exported.
- Reference table
- Visible in the report before the work is relied on or exported.
- Coverage gaps
- Visible in the report before the work is relied on or exported.
Exports and saved work
Export the work you need to share.
Patent practitioners live in reports, tables, emails, and matter folders. Online search has to produce work they can inspect, share with counsel, save, and resume.
Reference CSV
Export after review and approval; the action is recorded.
PDF landscape memo
Export after review and approval; the action is recorded.
Coverage note
Export after review and approval; the action is recorded.
Trust and limits
Clear enough to use, bounded enough to trust.
You see the safeguards and limits before relying on the report. Legal conclusions, restricted data, and enterprise rollout stay outside self-serve.
- Coverage assumptions visible
- Ownership source limits named
- No market-intel overclaim
- No complete market map
- No chain-of-title opinion
- No financial diligence
Next step
Use the same search type on your matter.
Sign in, accept the terms, confirm you are authorized to use the information, review the price, approve credit use, then search and export the report.